2007'03.14.Wed
Chinese Cities See Biggest Improvement in Living Standards in Asia, Reports Survey
March 14, 2007
-- Shanghai best location in China for expatriates -- Chinese and Indian locations show most significant improvement in living standards HONG KONG, March 14 /Xinhua-PRNewswire/ -- Shanghai is the most favourable location in mainland China for expatriates, followed by Nanjing, Beijing, Tianjin and Guangzhou, according to a survey conducted by ECA International, the world's leading knowledge and solutions provider for international HR professionals. Undertaken annually, ECA International's location ranking survey compares living standards in 254 locations globally according to categories including climate, air quality, health services, housing and utilities, isolation, social network and leisure facilities, infrastructure, personal safety and political tensions. Overall scores are used by ECA Member companies to establish allowances which compensate expatriate staff for the difficulties of living in their assignment location. Ranked 76th in the world and 11th in Asia, Shanghai justifies its position as the best city in mainland China for foreigners because of the superior infrastructure and facilities it boasts and its more cosmopolitan make-up. "Shanghai, like Beijing, provides foreigners with better housing, health services, schools, goods and services, recreational facilities and transport links than most other cities in China, which explains its top spot," comments Lee Quane, General Manager, ECA International Hong Kong. "Beijing, however, drops to 3rd place in the China ranking because of high pollution and a less favourable climate than Shanghai," adds Quane. While living conditions in Xi'an have improved at the fastest rate of all Chinese cities surveyed, it remains the least favourable place in China for foreigners due to the lack of suitable facilities and its harsh climate. Chengdu, Wuhan, Chongqing and Shenyang make up the bottom five out of the 13 Chinese locations included in the survey. Although not in the bottom five, Shenzhen is perceived to be the least safe city for expatriates. Living standards improving most in China Comparing this year's ranking with five years ago, living standards throughout China have improved significantly in recent years, reflected by a 28-position rise up the rankings, on average, across the country -- double the average increase across Asia. Locations which have improved the most include Chongqing, Dalian, Wuhan and Xi'an, which have all moved up the rankings by more than 40 places since 2002. Shanghai remains the most favourable location in mainland China and has moved up ECA's global ranking from 103 to 76 in the past five years, overtaking Seoul, Bandar Seri Begawan, Cape Town, Panama City and Santiago amongst others. Furthermore, a number of China's second tier cities have moved ahead of major Asian cities such as Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City and, Manila. Improvements have been slowest in locations such as Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenyang and Tianjin. "Such an overall rise in the global ranking reflects significant improvement throughout China, with more cities than ever benefiting from economic development and investment. Only India and some Eastern European locations can match China's improvement in living standards during this period," comments Quane. "However, the rate of improvement is not consistent across all of China's cities. Beijing's movement up our rankings has been hampered by consistently high levels of air pollution. Furthermore, although locations such as Xi'an have improved dramatically in the past five years they still remain in the lower half of our rankings and require high hardship allowances to encourage expatriates to accept assignments there." Trends in Asia Within Asia, Wuhan and Xi'an have shown the biggest improvement in living standards, both moving up 46 places in the rankings. Outside of mainland China, locations in India, such as Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai and New Delhi have risen by more than 20 places over the past five years, as have Macau, Phnom Penh, Ulaanbaatar, Vientiane and Tokyo. Out of the 48 Asian locations in the survey, only eight locations have fallen down the rankings between 2002 and 2007, with Port Moresby, Jakarta and Bandar Seri Begawan deteriorating the most, in terms of living standards afforded to foreigners. Hong Kong has fallen from 18th to 23rd during this period. It is not all good news for Asia, however, with a five year comparison highlighting that some aspects of living standards, such as air quality, are deteriorating. Air pollution in a number of locations, such as Beijing, Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, Port Moresby and Jakarta has worsened in recent years, which has led to an increase in the associated health risks. Such a deterioration reflects some of the more negative impacts of economic development in Asia. Implications on mobility An improvement in living standards in China's first and second tier cities should encourage mobility to locations historically considered 'hardship' postings. As a result, multinational companies should find it easier to encourage their internationally mobile employees to undertake assignments in these locations, while assignment costs may also be reduced. "With the general improvement in living conditions in China over the past five years we now recommend lower 'hardship' allowances in many places, particularly amongst second-tier cities such as Nanjing, Wuhan and Xi'an", adds Quane. "This is making a number of assignments to China more cost-effective for companies since 'hardship' allowances, which can be a costly component of an expatriate's salary package, are being reduced." Global and Asian rankings Locations in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Canada, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Ireland and Switzerland join Singapore to make up the top ten favourable locations for Asian expatriates to live. The least favourable place in the world to live is Baghdad, followed by Kabul and Karachi. Looking at the 48 Asian locations included in the survey, Macau, Taipei, Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur and Georgetown join Singapore, Kobe, Osaka, Tokyo and Hong Kong to make up the top 10. Karachi, Pyongyang, Islamabad, Dhaka and Dili are the locations in Asia which afford foreigners the worst quality of living, largely due to the risk to personal security and lack of suitable expatriate facilities. Locations in Africa tend to be situated in the bottom half of the rankings. Cape Town, ranked 95th, is the most favourable location in Africa for Asians to live, while locations in Algeria, Angola, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Guinea Republic, Niger, Nigeria and Sudan all fall into the highest 'hardship' allowance banding and attract the maximum 'hardship' allowance that ECA advises. The best locations in the world for Asians to live RANK 06/07 Location 1 Singapore - Singapore 2 Australia - Sydney 3 Australia - Melbourne 4 Japan - Kobe 5 Australia - Canberra =6 Canada - Vancouver =6 Denmark - Copenhagen 8 New Zealand - Wellington 9 Netherlands - Amsterdam =10 Japan - Osaka =10 Japan - Tokyo =10 Belgium - Brussels =10 Germany - Bonn =10 Ireland - Dublin =10 Switzerland - Basel =10 Switzerland - Geneva Asian locations shows most significant improvement in living standards Location Asia rank Global rank 06/07 (02/03) 06/07 (02/03) Singapore - Singapore 1 (1) 1 (1) Japan - Kobe 2 (2) 4 (10) Japan - Tokyo 3 (5) 10 (33) Japan - Osaka 3 (3) 10 (16) Hong Kong - Hong Kong 5 (4) 23 (18) Macau - Macau 6 (10) 56 (80) Taiwan - Taipei 7 (8) 58 (63) Thailand - Bangkok 8 (9) 60 (68) Malaysia - Kuala Lumpur 9 (7) 63 (60) Malaysia - Georgetown 10 (12) 74 (99) China - Shanghai 11 (13) 76 (103) Brunei - Bandar Seri Begawan 12 (6) 80 (58) Korea Republic - Seoul 13 (11) 89 (95) China - Nanjing 14 (17) 91 (126) China - Beijing 15 (14) 107 (110) China - Tianjin 16 (17) 108 (126) China - Guangzhou 17 (15) 116 (116) China - Xiamen 18 (24) 117 (154) China - Shenzhen 19 (21) 119 (147) Vietnam - Hanoi 19 (16) 119 (122) China - Dalian 21 (28) 124 (166) Vietnam - Ho Chi Minh City 21 (19) 124 (129) Indonesia - Denpasar 23 (22) 130 (148) Philippines - Metro-Manila 24 (20) 132 (142) China - Chengdu 25 (26) 136 (163) India - Chennai 26 (31) 138 (179) Laos - Vientiane 27 (33) 144 (183) China - Wuhan 28 (35) 147 (193) Sri Lanka - Colombo 28 (23) 147 (151) India - Bangalore 30 (31) 150 (179) China - Chongqing 31 (36) 154 (196) China - Shenyang 31 (30) 154 (170) India - Mumbai 33 (33) 158 (183) China - Xi'an 34 (40) 160 (206) Mongolia - Ulaanbaatar 35 (37) 162 (197) Myanmar - Yangon 36 (25) 164 (159) India - New Delhi 37 (42) 174 (217) Cambodia - Phnom Penh 37 (39) 174 (204) Indonesia - Jakarta 39 (27) 190 (165) Nepal - Kathmandu 40 (40) 196 (206) India - Kolkata 40 (38) 196 (201) Papua New Guinea - Port Moresby 42 (29) 210 (168) Indonesia - Surabaya 43 (44) 214 (221) East Timor - Dili 44 (43) 225 (220) Bangladesh - Dhaka 45 (45) 227 (230) Pakistan - Islamabad 46 (47) 240 (240) North Korea - Pyongyang 47 (46) 248 (236) Pakistan - Karachi 48 (48) 252 (249) About ECA International ECA International is the world's largest membership organisation for international human resources professionals, serving a global network of over 4000 HR professionals in 71 countries. The leading provider of online data, software solutions and advice for more than 1500 international companies, ECA's innovative approach has been providing cost-effective solutions to international HR management since 1971. For more information, please visit http://www.eca-international.com . About ECA's Location Ranking Survey The Location Ranking Survey is carried out on an annual basis. The rankings above and below are made by comparing the factors listed above for 254 locations worldwide on an Asian base. ECA's Location Ranking Survey is delivered through ECAAdapt, part of its Assign suite of HR information tools. ECAAdapt offers a transparent and detailed system for calculating location or "hardship" allowances for expatriates relocating to a new country. ECAAdapt allows users to select region-to-city allowances or city-to-city allowances, so that depending on your policy the system reflects the level of detail that required. ECA's system provides an immediate "banding" for the host location, based in part on the circumstances of the home location. With the banding comes ECA's recommended allowances, expressed as a percentage of home gross salary. ECAAdapt also gives breakdowns of the scoring given to a number of different categories contributing to the overall score which translates to banding and allowances. Categories include climate, health services, isolation, social network and leisure facilities, infrastructure and political tensions. For more information, please contact: ECA International, Hong Kong Lee Quane Tel: +852-2121-2388 Email: lee.quane@eca-international.com ECA International, London Sam Matthews Tel: +44-20-7351-5000 Email: sam.matthews@eca-international.com EASTWEST Public Relations Jay Sim Tel: +65-6429-0302 Email: jay@eastwestpr.com EASTWEST Public Relations Nellie Wang Tel: +86-10-5869-7335 Email: Nellie@eastwestpr.com
PR
Post your Comment
広告
ブログ内検索
アーカイブ
カウンター